Circular clarifying GST impact on transactions related to outsourcing of IT enabled services by overseas entities

0

Central Board of Indirect Tax & Customs (CBIC) issued circular no. 20/06/03/2019-GST dated 18th July, 2019 clarifying implications under GST related to Information Technology enabled services (ITes) outsourced to Indian entities by overseas companies (i.e. call centres, business process outsourcing service, accounts outsourcing service etc.). The said circular clarifies that the definition of “intermediary” u/s. 2(13) of IGST Act inter alia provides specific exclusion of a person i.e. that of a person who supplies such goods or services or both or securities on his own accountTherefore, the supplier of services would not be treated as “intermediary” even where the supplier of services qualifies to be “an agent/ broker or any other person” if he is involved in the supply of service on his own account.

The circular mentions that IT enabled services have not been defined under GST Act however, the same has been defined as below under sub-rule (e) of rule 10A of Income Tax Rules, 1962 pertaining to Safe Harbour rules for international transactions;

“information technology enabled services” means the following business process outsourcing services provided mainly with the assistance or use of information technology, namely;

(i) back office operations;

(ii) call centers or contact center services;

(iii) data processing and data mining;

(iv) insurance claim processing;

(v) legal databases;

(vi) creation and maintenance of medical transcription excluding medical advice;  

(vii) translation services;

(viii) payroll;

(ix) remote maintenance;

(x) revenue accounting;

(xi) support centers;

(xii) website services;

(xiii) data search integration and analysis;

(xiv) remote education excluding education content development; or

(xv) clinical database management services excluding clinical trials,

but does not include any research and development services whether or not in the nature of contract research and development services.

Implications under GST shall be as below;

  • Where the supplier provides services as listed above to his clients or customers of his clients on his own account, the supplier will not be categorized as “intermediary” and hence the supplier can avail the benefits of export of services under GST subject to compliance with the criteria mentioned in section 2(6) of IGST Act.
  • Where the supplier arranges or facilitates the supply of goods or back-end services or both which include support services, services provided during pre-delivery, delivery and post-delivery of supply (such as order placement and delivery and logistical support, obtaining relevant government clearances, transportation of goods, post-sales support and other services etc.), the supplier will fall under the ambit of “intermediary” under section 2(13) of IGST Act. Hence, the services provided by the supplier will be not qualify as export of service under GST.
  • Where the supplier provides back-end services on his own account along with arranging or facilitating the supply of various support services as listed above, whether the supplier will fall under the ambit of “intermediary” under section 2(13) of IGST Act will depend on facts and circumstances of each case and would be determined keeping in view which set of services is the principal/ main supply.

Conclusion:

As can be seen from the aforesaid analysis that the deciding factor to qualify service provider as “intermediary” depends on the fact whether the service provider is providing services on his own or arranges/facilitates the sameIf the service provider falls within the ambit of “intermediary”, he will not be eligible to claim the benefit of export of services under GST. As such there is very thin line of difference in deciding factors to determine whether the service provider is providing services for the client and customers of client on his own or arranges the same. Hence, it should be decided very judiciously after considering all the underlying facts and especially terms of the contract executed between the service provider and the overseas company.

According to the views of the author, few of the deciding factors in determining whether the service provided by the service provider on his own or as a facilitator could be;

  • Whether the service provider provides exclusive service to the client or provide similar service to more than one client
  • Contractual arrangements between the service provider and the client viz. whether the fees payable to the supplier of service depends on reimbursement of cost incurred for the people employed by the supplier of service or fixed in nature depending on nature of service
  • Responsibility casted on the supplier of service as regards deliverance/ performance
  • Whether the services are provided by the service provider independently or jointly along with the team of overseas client
  • Whether the service provider is independent to take all the necessary decisions as regards the performance of service or not

GST Circular clarifying treatment of goods sent/taken out of India for exhibition or on consignment basis and procedural aspects under GST

0

Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs clarified through circular No.108/27/2019-GST dated 18th July, 2019 about procedures, documentation and implications under GST on transaction with respect to goods sent/taken out of India for exhibition or on consignment basis for export promotion. Key aspects of the same have been highlighted below.

  1. Activity of sending/ taking the goods out of India for exhibition or on consignment basis for export promotion do not constitute “supply” except when such activity satisfy the tests laid down in Schedule I of the Act.
  2. The registered person engaged in such activity needs to maintain a record in the format specified in circular as annexure.
  3. The goods can be sent/taken outside India on “approval basis” shall be accompanied by delivery challan issued in accordance with rule 55 of CGST Rules, 2017 [i.e. Transportation of goods without issue of invoice]
  4. Since such transactions will not constitute “supply”, execution of a bond or LUT is not required.
  5. The supply would be deemed to have taken place, on the expiry of six months from the date of removal if the goods are neither sold abroad nor brought back within six month. Hence, the tax invoice is to be issued once the sale is confirmed or on expiry of six months from the date of removal in case goods are neither sold nor brought back within the stipulated time.
  6. Refund claim can be preferred only once sale is confirmed and not at the time of sending of goods on consignment. In case of deemed sale where neither sale is confirmed nor goods are brought back within six months, refund claim cannot be preferred under the option of export with payment (Rule 96). However, in such cases, refund claim can be preferred under LUT option.

High Court allowed set-off of credit availed on construction of an immovable property against GST payable on rent income

Safari Retreats Private Limited (“Company”) Vs Chief Commissioner of Central Goods & Service tax (Orissa High Court)

The Company is mainly carrying on business activity of constructing shopping malls for the purpose of letting out of the same. Various materials and other inputs such as Cement, Sand, Steel, Aluminum, Wires, plywood, paint, Lifts, escalators, Air-Conditioning plant, Chillers, electrical equipments, DG sets, transformers, building automation systems and services such as architectural service, legal and professional service, engineering service and other services including services of special team of international designers were availed by the Company. All these goods and services purchased/received for such construction are taxable under the GST.

The Company completed construction of one of the large shopping mall at Odisha and started letting out different units of the said shopping mall to different persons on rental basis. The activity of letting out the units of the shopping mall attracts CGST and OGST on the amount of rent received by the Company. The Company having accumulated input Credit of GST amounting to Rs 34,40,18,028/- in respect of purchases of inputs in the form of goods and services wanted to avail the credit of input tax in order to utilise the said input credits to discharge and pay GST payable on the rentals received by the Company from the tenants. The revenue authorities advised the Company to deposit the CGST and OGST collected without taking input credit in view of restrictions placed as per Section 17(5)(d). The benefit of input tax credit has been denied to the petitioner on the ground that, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the goods and services or both received by a taxable person for construction of an immovable property (other than plant or machinery) on his own account including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business.

Held by Orissa High Court:

While considering the provisions of Section 17(5)(d), the narrow construction of interpretation put forward by the Department in not in line with very objective of the Act, inasmuch as the petitioner in that case has to pay huge amount without any basis. In our considered opinion, the provision of Section 17(5)(d) is to be read down and the narrow restriction as imposed, reading of the provision by the Department, is not required to be accepted, inasmuch as keeping in mind the language used in (1999) 2 SCC 361 (supra), the very purpose of the credit is to give benefit to the assessee. In that view of the matter, if the assessee is required to pay GST on the rental income arising out of the investment on which he has paid GST, it is required to have the input credit on the GST, which is required to pay under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act.

Tax Incentive for Employment Generation under Section 80JJAA of Income Tax Act

0

Section 80JJAA of Income Tax Act Background

Section 80JJAA of income tax act was introduced to provide incentives to industries to generate employment for semi-skilled and unskilled labours. It was amended by Finance Act, 2016 and again under Finance Act, 2018. We have summarized important provisions as below.

Eligibility for claiming deduction under Section 80JJAA

  • Assessee should be subject to tax audit u/s. 44AB of Income Tax Act and has profit or gains from business.
  • Business should not have been formed by splitting up or by way of reconstruction of an existing business. A business formed by re-establishment, reconstruction or revival by the assessee of the business u/s. 33B can claim this deduction.
  • Business should not be acquired by way of transfer from any other person or as a result of any business reorganization.

Amount of Deduction under Section 80JJAA

One can claim a deduction of an amount equivalent to thirty per cent of additional employee cost for three assessment years. This means that in each three years entity is eligible to claim the deduction of 130% of the employee cost paid to new employees.

Additional Employee Cost is the total emoluments paid or payable to surplus employees employed during the last year.

Additional cost shall be NIL, if:

  • there is no increase in the number of employees from the total number of employees employed as on the last day of the preceding year
  • emoluments are paid otherwise than by an account payee cheque or account payee bank draft or bank transfer

Additional employee cost eligible for deduction under section 80JJAA of Income Tax Act will be Rs. 1,17,87,600. (188 employees*Rs.19,000*11 months*30%).

  • an employee whose total emoluments are more than twenty-five thousand rupees per month
  • an employee for whom the entire contribution is paid by the Government under the Employees Pension Scheme
  • an employee employed for a period of less than two hundred and forty days* during the previous year
  • an employee who does not participate in the recognised provident fund

*In case of the business of manufacturing of apparel or footwear or leather products, two hundred forty days is substituted with one hundred and fifty days.

It has been clarified that where an employee has not been employed for a period as mentioned above in a financial year and completes the minimum period of employment in next financial year, he/she shall be deemed to have been employed in the succeeding financial year and benefit of this section can be taken accordingly.

Examples

XYZ Pvt. Ltd. is incorporated on 30th June 2015 and engaged in the business of manufacturing. It had 250 employees as on 31st March 2018.

a) During the financial year 2018-19, 70 new employees were employed and 20 employees (old and new) resigned before 31st March 2019. Employees as on 31st March 2019 will be as follows:

ParticularsNumber of Employees
a)      No. of employees as on 31st March 2019300
b)      No. of employees as on 31st March 2018250
c)       Increase in no. of employees for which additional employee cost will be deductible50

b) The company employed 15 new employees during the financial year 2018-19 out of which 5 resigned. Out of the existing employees, 20 employees also resigned during the year. Increase in the number of employees will be:

ParticularsNumber of Employees
a)      No. of employees as on 31st March 2019240
b)      No. of employees as on 31st March 2018250
c)       Increase in no. of employees for which additional employee cost will be deductible0

c) The company employed 600 new employees during the financial year 2018-19. Also, 60 old employees had resigned during the year:

GradeDate of JoiningNo. of employees employedNo. of employees resignedMonthly salary per employee
I01/04/201810015Rs.28,000
II01/05/201820012Rs.19,000
III01/01/201920016Rs.15,000
IV02/01/201910022Rs.7,000
 TOTAL60065 

Total additional employees employed during the year 2018-19 are as follows:

ParticularsNumber of Employees
a)      No. of employees as on 31st March 2019725
b)      No. of employees as on 31st March 2018250
c)       Increase in no. of employees475
ParticularsNumber of Employees
a)      No. of new employees employed during the year600
b)      Less: No. of employees having emoluments more than Rs.25000100
c)       Less: No. of employees not fulfilling the condition of 240 days300
d)      Less: No. of employees resigned out of new employees who are eligible (Grade II)12
e)      No. of additional employees for whom we can claim additional employee cost188

Additional employee cost eligible for deduction under section 80JJAA will be Rs. 1,17,87,600. (188 employees*Rs.19,000*11 months*30%).

Compliance Requirement

An employer is required to obtain Form 10DA from a practising CA for claiming the deduction. The form should be filled before filing an income tax return for that year.

Income tax return has to be filed on or before the due date specified under section 139(1) of the Act.

Issues that require more clarity from Tax Authorities

  • Does the threshold limit of days include leave period as well?
  • What will happen in case of upward revision of salary in year 2 or 3?
  • What is to be considered as emoluments? Whether bonus or non-monetary perquisites be considered for computation of emoluments and whether it is eligible for deduction?

High time to consider tax benefit under section 80JJAA

Considering the March end, this is high time to claim benefits under the Income Tax Act for the financial year 2018-19. Ascertain the tax benefit available for the financial year 2018-19 and obtain a certificate from a practicing Chartered Accountant as per compliance requirement.

For more information on the subject, please get in touch with us.

Also Read:

RCM under GST applies to remuneration to employee director

GST update – Clarifications on treatment of various sales promotion schemes provided by CBIC through circular

0

CBIC has clarified various doubts as regards treatment of various sales promotional schemes under GST vide circular 92/11/2019 dated 7th March 2019 to ensure uniform implementation of the law. Summary of the said circular is as below.

Free Samples & Gift

It is clarified that samples which are supplied free of cost without any consideration do not qualify as “supply” under GST and hence will not be subject to tax except where the transactions fall within the ambit of schedule I of the Act specifying transactions which are subject to tax when carried out without consideration. As per clause (h) of section 17(5), the input tax credit shall not be available to the supplier on inputs, input services and capital goods to the extent they are used in relation to the gifts and free samples. However, if the said transaction is subject to tax under schedule I of the Act, the input tax credit will be available. 

Discount offered linked to volume of purchase

Sometimes a supplier offers a discount in proportion to quantity purchased by the customers e.g. 10% discount on purchase above Rs.5000/-, 15% discount on purchase above Rs.10,000/- and so on. Such discounts are shown on the face of the invoice. Some suppliers offer periodic/ year-end discounts to stockists/ distributors based on quantity purchased by them during the period/ year. such discounts are established in terms of the agreement entered into at the time of supply or even before that. In such cases, discounts are not shown on the face of invoice since such discounts are decided later based on volume supplied. Such discounts are passed on by the suppliers through credit notes

Buy one and Get one free

As stated above, goods and services which are supplied free of cost are not subject to tax (except in case of activities covered under schedule I of the Act). In case of buy one get one free offer, it is not free to supply but two or more supplies are supplied at a single price charged for the entire supply. Taxability of such supply will be dependent upon as to whether the supply is a composite supply or mixed supply and the rate of taxation will be determined as per section 8 of the Act. It is pertinent to note that as per section 8, for composite supply, tax rate applicable on item constituting as principal supply will be applicable on the full value of supply offered as part of buy one get one free. In case of mixed supply consisting of two or more supplies offered as a package for a single price (without bifurcation), tax rate applicable to the product/service with the highest rate of tax will be applied to the entire value of supplyIt is also clarified that ITC shall be available to the supplier for the inputs, input services and capital goods used in relation to supply of goods or services or both as part of such offers.  

It is clarified that discounts offered by the suppliers to customers as above shall be excluded to determine the value of supply provided they satisfy the parameters laid down in sub-section (3) of section 15 of the said Act i.e. if the discount is offered after the supply, such discount is established in terms of agreement entered into at or before the time of such supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices and input tax credit attributable to such discount on the basis of document issued by the supplier has been reversed by the recipient.

Secondary Discount

These are the discounts which are not known at the time of supply or are offered after the supply is already over. It has been clarified that where condition laid down in clause (b) of section 15(3) with regards the reversal of input tax credit by the recipient of the supply is not fulfilled, credit note u/s. 34(1) can not be issued to give the effect of reduction in tax amount due to the discount offered subsequently. Hence, it is very important to note that credit note cannot be issued to reduce the taxable value of supply under GST unless the recipient of supply does a reversal of the credit attributable to the discount value offered by the supplier subsequent to supply of goods and services. Unilateral act of reducing the value of supply by the supplier through the issue of credit note without verification of the fact that recipient of the supply did a reversal of the input tax credit will result into the recovery of tax on the part of the supplier. 

GST Update – CBIC notifies return due dates and applicability of pronouncements made by GST council in Jan. 2019

0

Highlights of notifications issued by CBIC dated 7th March 2019 are as below.

Increase in turnover threshold limit for dealers under composition scheme

Threshold limit of aggregate turnover for composition scheme dealers u/s.10 of CGST Act has been enhanced to Rs. 1.5 crore during previous financial year. This will be applicable effective from 1st April, 2019. For 7 notified states (Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura, Uttrakhand), threshold limit shall be Rs.75 lacs. Notification no. 14/2019 – Central Tax supersedes the earlier notification 08/2017 – Central Tax dated 27-06-2017.

Due date for filling 3B return

Due date for filling 3B return for the months of April to June 2019 has been prescribed as 20th day from the end of respective month. Every registered person furnishing the return in FORM GSTR-3B of the said rules shall, subject to the provisions of section 49 of the said Act, discharge his liability towards tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount payable under the said Act by debiting the electronic cash ledger or electronic credit ledger, as the case may be. Notification 13/2019 – Central Tax.

Due date for filling GSTR-1 return (monthly)

Due date for filling GSTR-1 return for the months of April to June 2019 has been prescribed as 11th day from the end of respective month for registered persons having aggregate turnover of more than 1.5 crore rupees in the preceding financial year or the current financial year. Time limit for furnishing details of inward supplies as per section 38(2) and return for discharge of tax liability 39(1) of CGST Act will be notified later depending on smooth functioning of new mechanism of return filling which is proposed to be made operational effective from July 2019. Notification 12/2019 Central Tax.

Due date for filling GSTR-1 return (quarterly)

Due date for filling GSTR-1 return for the months of April to June 2019 has been prescribed as 31st July, 2019 for registered persons having aggregate turnover of up to 1.5 crore rupees in the preceding financial year or the current financial year. Time limit for furnishing details of inward supplies as per section 38(2) and return for discharge of tax liability 39(1) of CGST Act will be notified later depending on smooth functioning of new mechanism of return filling which is proposed to be made operational effective from July 2019. Notification 11/2019 Central Tax.

Threshold limit for mandatory registration increased to Rs.40 lacs

Any person, who is engaged in exclusive supply of goods (within state) and whose aggregate turnover in the financial year does not exceed forty lakh rupees are not required to get registered under GST. This will be made effective from 1st April, 2019. However, this will not be applicable to following class of persons. Notification 10/2019 – Central Tax.

  • Persons required to get registered under act compulsorily irrespective of turnover u/s.24 of CGST Act including persons engaged in inter-state supply of goods
  • Persons engaged in supply of ice cream and other edible ice whether or not containing cocoa, pan masala, tobacco and manufactured tobacco substitutes
  • Persons engaged in making intra-State supplies in the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Puducherry, Sikkim, Telangana, Tripura, Uttarakhand
  • Persons opt for voluntary registration u/s. 25(3) of CGST Act
  • Previously, notification 5/2017 was issued under section 23(2) which exempted those who are entirely supplying exempted goods or services but are liable to registration only due to their liability to tax under 9(3). But now, this exemption appears to override section 22. It is to be noted that where aggregate turnover includes income by way of interest or discount on loans and advances the benefit of this exemption notification cannot be taken. ‘Exclusively engaged in supply of goods’ is a condition of the notification and section 22 can be invoked if this condition is violated on any day in the year and tax from Rs.20 lacs upto the date when this condition stands breached may become due without any availability of input tax credit.

  Composition scheme for supplier of services

Composition scheme has been notified for the service providers having Lacsturnover in the preceding year up to Rs.50 lakh. First supplies of goods or services or both the aggregate turnover of fifty lakh rupees made on or after the 1st day of April in any financial year, by a registered person can avail benefit of composition scheme subject to following conditions. Tax rate applicable in case of taxable supplies by the composite dealer will be 6% (CGST &  SGST @ 3% each). This will be made effective from 1st April 2019. Notification 2/2019 Central Tax

  • Supplies are made by registered person having turnover up to Rs.50 lakh during previous financial year and not eligible to pay tax as composite dealer u/s.10
  • Registered person was not engaged in making any supply which is not leviable to tax
  • Registered person is not engaged in making inter-state supply
  • Registered person is neither a casual taxable person nor a non-resident taxable person
  • Tax rate applicable for all supplies will be 6% notwithstanding different tax rates prescribed under section 9 or 11 of CGST Act
  • Registered person is not engaged in making any supply through an electronic commerce operator who is required to collect tax at source under section 52
  • Registered persons engaged in supply of ice cream and other edible ice whether or not containing cocoa, pan masala, tobacco and manufactured tobacco substitutes
  • Where more than one registered persons are having the same Permanent Account Number, union territory tax on supplies by all such registered persons is paid @6%
  • The registered person shall not collect any tax from the recipient on supplies made by him nor shall he be entitled to any credit of input tax.
  • Other conditions as applicable to casual taxable person engaged in supply of goods will also be applicable to supplier of service viz. the supplier will not issue tax invoice, declaration on bill of supply etc.
  • The registered person under composition scheme shall pay tax on all inward supplies for which he is liable to pay tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism as per section 9(3) and 9(4) of CGST Act. So composition dealer is also liable to pay tax under reverse charge mechanism as applicable to regular category of tax payer.

It has also been clarified as part of explanation that supplies from the first day of financial year (i.e. 1st April, 2019) will be considered for the purpose of eligibility of the person to register under composition scheme. But for the purpose of determination of tax payable under this notification shall not include the supplies from the first day of April of a financial year to the date from which he becomes liable for registration under the Act.

Supreme Court Ruling on applicability of PF on allowances

Background

The Supreme Court verdict dated 28 February 2019 in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner West Bengal v. Vivekananda Vidayamandir and others reiterated the salutary principles of ascertaining components of salary to be considered for the calculation of provident fund (PF) contribution by the employer and deduction from employees’ salary. This can be considered as landmark judgement about applicability of PF considering that it addresses multiple civil petitions pending before the apex court on subject matter and takes into consider all preceding pronouncements on the subject.

Facts of the Case

Multiple appeals before the Supreme Court raised a common question of law whether allowances such as travel allowance, canteen allowance, education allowance, special allowance, conveyance allowance, management allowance etc. paid by an establishment to the employees would fall within the definition of “basic wages” for the purpose of contribution under EPF Act.

Provisions under EPF Act

Basic wage, under section 2(b) of EPF Act has been defined as all emoluments paid in cash to an employee in accordance with the terms of his contract of employment. But it carves out certain exceptions which would not fall within the definition of basic wage and which includes dearness allowance apart from other allowances mentioned therein (i.e. the cash value of food concession, house ­rent allowance, overtime allowance, bonus, commission or any other similar allowance payable to the employee in respect of his employment or of work done in such employment). But this exclusion of dearness allowance finds inclusion in Sec. 6 of EPF Act. The test adopted to determine whether particular allowance to be excluded from basic wage is that the payment under the scheme must have a direct access and linkage to the payment of such special allowance as not being common to all. The crucial test is one of universality.

Arguments before the Hon’ble Court

It was argued that the special allowance paid to the teaching and non­-teaching staff of the respondent school was nothing but camouflaged dearness allowance to reduce the contribution towards EPF. It is to be considered for the purpose of calculating contribution under EPF. The allowance shall fall within the term dearness allowance, irrespective of the nomenclature, since it was being paid to all employees on account of rise in the cost of living.

Ratio/Key Takeaways from the Ruling of Hon’ble Court

  • Basic wages which vary from individual to individual according to their efficiency and diligence will stand excluded for the purpose of computation of contribution towards EPF.  In other words, the allowances in question can be excluded only if; it is variable or linked to any incentive for production resulting in greater output by an employee.
  • Test to be adopted to determine if any payment is to be excluded is that the payment under the scheme must have direct access and linkage to the payment of such special allowance as not being common to allThe crucial test is one of universality.  Where the wage is universally, necessarily and ordinarily paid to all across the board such emoluments are to be considered for the purpose of contribution towards EPF.
  • Where the payment is specially paid to those who avail of the opportunity is not to be considered. Eg. it was held that overtime allowance, though it is generally in force in all concerns is not earned by all employees of a concern. It is also earned in accordance with the terms of the contract of employment but because it may not be earned by all employees of a concern, it is to be excluded. In other words, the amount can be excluded only if it is shown that the workman concerned had become eligible to get this extra amount beyond the normal work which he was otherwise required to put in.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that special allowance or any other allowance, by whatever name called, normally paid by an establishment shall be taken into consideration for the purpose of computation of contribution towards EPF unless; 

  • Allowances are variable in nature; or
  • Allowances which are linked to any incentive for production resulting in greater output by an employee; or
  • Allowances which are not paid across the board to all employees in a particular category; or
  • Allowance which are paid especially to those who avail the opportunity.

This is an important ruling which shall have significant implications for establishment covered under EPF act. The establishments need to revisit and salary and compensation structure in view of aforesaid judgement. It is pertinent to note that employees drawing salary/wages of Rs.15,000 per month are subject to EPF.  

Salient features of Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Ordinance, 2019 restricting acceptance of loans & deposits from any person other than relatives

0

Ministry of Law and Justice notified The Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Ordinance 2019 vide notification published in official Gazette on 21st February 2019. It provides a comprehensive mechanism to ban the unregulated deposit schemes and to protect the interest of depositors and matters connected thereto. This bill could not be passed in the house of Rajyasabha however, President given his consent looking at the prevailing circumstances in exercise of powers conferred by clause (1) of article 123 of the Constitution. The said ordinance is applicable immediately (effective from 21st February 2019). This law will help in tackling the risk of accepting fraudulent deposits and to safeguard the interest of investors. The law has been enacted especially to regulate Unregulated Deposit Schemes after the Saradha and Rose Valley chit fund schemes that shook West Bengal & other states. There are 166 more such chit fund cases where investors lost their monies that have been registered in the last four years. The introduction of this ordinance will regulate and control non-corporate deposit takers who tempt the public at large with lucrative schemes. Definition of “deposit takers” also include any individuals/ group of individuals, proprietorship concerns and partnership firms apart from other recognized legal structures (viz. LLP, companies, societies)

The ordinance defines “Deposit” as an amount of money received by way of an advance or loan or in any other form, by any deposit taker with a promise to return whether after a specified period or otherwise in whatever form. Pursuant to the definition of “Deposit” and exclusions, now any individual or group of individuals cannot take any deposit or loan from any person other than relatives, whereas partnership firms can take deposit or loan from relatives or partners only. However, genuine connection to businesses like an advance for supply/hire of goods, consideration of immovable property, security or dealership deposited for the performance of the contract and supply of capital goods are excluded from the ambit of the ordinance.

The ordinance defines “Regulated Deposit Scheme” as those schemes regulated by SEBI, RBI, IRDA, State Governments or Union Territory Governments, National Housing Banks, Pension Funds Regulatory, EPFO, Central registrar Multi State Co-operative societies, MCA and other regulatory bodies. All other deposits will be considered as “Unregulated Deposits”No deposit taker shall directly or indirectly promote, operate issue any advertisement soliciting participation or enrollment in or accept deposits in pursuance of an Unregulated Deposit Scheme. It has been further clarified through insertion of explanation in Multi State Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act that it shall not be entitled to receive deposits from persons other than voting members. Vide amendment of section 45I of RBI Act 1934, an explanation has been inserted stating that the amount accepted by co-operative society from members/ shareholders/ associate members who do not have full voting rights in meetings shall be deemed to be deposit.

Under section 9, the government may designate an authority whether existing or to be constituted which shall create, maintain and operate an online database for information on deposit takers operating in India. As per section 10 of the ordinance, existing and new deposit takers shall intimate the designated authorities about its business in such form and manner as applicable from time to time as prescribed and if the competent authority has a reason to believe that the deposits are being accepted pursuant to an Unregulated Deposit Scheme, it may direct deposit taker to furnish documents/statements as it considers necessary relating to or connected with the deposit.

The ordinance provides for punishment ranging from 1 year to 10 years and fine ranging from Rs. 2 lakh to Rs.10 lakh in case of non-compliance. The ordinance provides for attachment of properties or assets and subsequent realisation of assets for repayment to depositors. Depositors’ have priority to all other debts and all revenues, taxes, cesses and other rates payable to the appropriate Government or the local authority at the time of insolvency.

Conclusion

As per the literal reading of ordinance, it seems that unless the amount received by way of advance or loan is falling under the exclusions of definition of “Deposit”, then the same is subject compliances prescribed under the ordinance. As can be seen from the preamble to ordinance, the intention of the legislature is to provide for a comprehensive mechanism to ban the unregulated deposit schemes to protect the interest of depositors. It seems that routine business transactions of accepting unsecured loan should be out of ambit of the law. The ordinance further gives power to the Government to exempt further schemes by notification and one can expect some relief/clarity through notification when final rules are published. Many representations are expected to happen in coming days and it is expected that Government will come up with clarifications in the form of FAQ soon.

KYC for Companies to be filed with Registrar latest by 25th April, 2019 as notified by MCA

0

Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has introduced KYC of Companies by inserting Rule 25A under Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014. This has been notified by MCA vide notification dated 21st February 2019 and shall be effective from 25th February 2019. Below are the highlights of the requirements of Rule 25A.

Every Company incorporated on or before 31st December 2017 is required to file e-Form ACTIVE (Active Company Tagging Identities and Verification) latest by 25th April 2019. In case of default in filing of e-Form ACTIVE, the status of the Company in MCA records shall be changed from Active to ACTIVE-non compliant and it shall attract penalties under Section 12(9) of Companies Act, 2013. Companies which has not filed its financial statements u/s. 137 and/or annual return u/s. 92 with the Registrar of Companies and companies which have been struck off or are under the process of striking off or under liquidation or amalgamated or dissolved as recorded in Registrar shall not be allowed to file form ACTIVE

Further, defaulting Company shall not be able to report the Corporate Actions to Registrar of Companies like Changes in Share Capital, Changes in directors except cessation, change in registered office and corporate restructuring. Belated filing will attract an additional fees of Rupees Ten Thousand.

In the e-form ACTIVE, the following details are required to be intimated to Registrar of Companies

  • Address of registered office with photo of registered office also showing at least one Director/Key Managerial Personnel who will sign the e-Form ACTIVE
  • Email ID of Company: Email ID shall be verified through One time password (OTP)
  • Number of Directors with list of directors as on date of filing of e-form
  • Details of Auditors – Statutory and Cost Auditor
  • Details of Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer or Manager or Wholetime Director, Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary.
  • Details of annual returns filed for financial year 2017-18.
  • Photograph of registered office showing external building and inside office also needs to be attached to e-form

This will enhance transparency and will server as yardstick to detect and identify shell/dormant companies.

GST Update – Circulars issued by CBIC related to returns & invoices

0

GST Policy Wing, CBIC has issued three circulars on 18th February, 2019 as listed below in brief.

Circular No. 90/09/2019 – GST dated 18-02-19: 

All registered persons making supply of goods or services or both in the course of inter-State trade or commerce to specify the place of supply along with the name of the State in the tax invoice. Sections 10 and 12 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 deals with the place of supply in case of supply of goods and services respectively. Since, GST is a destination-based consumption tax, the tax paid by a registered person accrues to the State in which the consumption of goods or services or both takes place.

Contravention of the above shall attract penal action under the provisions of section 125 of the CGST Act i.e. penalty upto Rs.25,000/- 

Circular No. 89/08/2019 – GST dated 18-02-19: 

It has been brought to the notice of tax payers that mentioning details of inter-state supplies made to unregistered persons in Table 3.2 of FORM GSTR-3B and Table 7B of FORM GSTR-1 is mandatory even though not mentioning the same in section 3.2 of GSTR 3B will have not impact on tax computation. Since the apportionment of IGST collected on inter–State supplies made to unregistered persons in the state where such supply takes place is based on the information reported in Table 3.2 of FORM GSTR-3B by the registered person, reporting is very important.

Contravention of the above shall attract penal action under the provisions of section 125 of the CGST Act i.e. penalty upto Rs.25,000/- 

Circular No. 91/10/2019 – GST dated 18-02-19

It was clarified through circular No. 3/1/2018-IGST on 25th May 2018 that from 1st of April, 2018, the supply of warehoused goods before their clearance from the warehouse would not be subject to the levy of integrated tax.

Supply of warehoused goods while deposited in custom bonded warehouses had the character of inter-State supply as per the provisions of IGST Act 2017. But, due to non-availability of the facility on the common portal, suppliers have reported such supplies as intra-State supplies and discharged central tax and state tax on such supplies instead of integrated tax. In view of revenue neutral position of such tax payment and that facility to correctly report the nature of transaction in FORM GSTR-1 furnished on the common portal was not available during the period July, 2017 to March, 2018, it has been decided that, as a one-time exception, suppliers who have paid central tax and state tax on such supplies, during the said period, would be deemed to have complied with the provisions of law as far as payment of tax on such supplies is concerned as long as the amount of tax paid as central tax and state tax is equal to the due amount of integrated tax on such supplies.